Ordinance 2026-15 – Second Reading - Rezoning of 1098 S. Pendleton
I voted Yes on Ordinance 2026-15; the rezoning of the property located at 1098 S. Pendleton Street.
This rezoning corrects the property's zoning classification to match its long-established use. The property has operated as a business for many years, and this action brings the zoning into alignment with the existing use of the property.
Ordinance 2026-16 – Second Reading - Adoption of the FY 2026-2027 Budget
I voted Yes on the budget ordinance. To the best of my recollection, this is the first time I have voted in favor of a budget on final reading.
I was pleased that the budget was balanced without a tax increase. However, I continue to have concerns about the long-term sustainability of allocating approximately 70% of General Fund expenditures toward salaries and benefits. My concern is not that employees do not deserve fair compensation as they absolutely do. Rather, it is important that the City maintain a balanced approach that allows investment in roads, infrastructure, and other community needs while remaining financially sustainable in the years ahead.
With the addition of a financial analyst, I am hopeful the City will be better positioned to forecast revenues, identify efficiencies, and create opportunities to fund additional priorities without placing a greater burden on taxpayers.
Ordinance 2026-17 – First Reading - Franchise Agreement for Fiber Optic Cable
I voted Yes on Ordinance 2026-17 regarding the franchise agreement for fiber optic cable services. I did not identify any concerns that would have justified a vote against the agreement.
Ordinance 2026-18 – Second Reading - Amendment to Chapter 30, Title III of the City Code
I voted Yes on the amendment to remove the word “date” in 30-05 (B) as it should have been part of the strike through. I voted No on the amendment that would have added the word "mayor" to Section 30.24(B). In my view, adding this was unnecessary. As was noted by Mr. Alexander in the discussion during the meeting, the existing language already includes the mayor within the definition of Council.
I voted Yes on this ordinance as amended.
Final Thoughts
I would like to address one final issue, and I hope it will be the last time I feel the need to do so.
South Carolina law grants municipal councils the authority to establish their own rules of procedure. The recent discussions on social media surrounding the ordinance amendments has unfortunately created division within our community. From my perspective, Council members were carrying out their responsibilities by reviewing, debating, and amending ordinances as part of the legislative process.
While reasonable people may disagree on policy matters, I believe we all share the same goal: doing what is best for the City of Easley. My hope is that we can move forward together, focus on serving our residents, and allow Council to perform its duties in a productive and respectful manner.